2006

OR211 Board

Nov 1, 2006

Date: November 10, 2006

To: Jeri Shumate, OR211 Board Chair

From: Kay Sohl, TACS Executive Director

Re: Notes from planning meeting on November 1, 2006


I. Core Principles to Guide OR211:

Participants identified core principles to guide the 211 effort:

OR211 is needed to play role in emergencies both human service and community emergencies.

OR211 will ensure availability of 211 services in every part of the state.

OR211 system will involve multiple providers

  • develop regionally
  • may share some resources among regions or statewide
  • inter-operability is essential – integrated database

OR211 is committed to reliability, consistency, quality

  • AIRS national standards will provide statewide quality standards
  • Privacy, self determination are essential
  • Work with specialized providers
  • Ensure availability of volunteer coordination for community emergencies

II. Oregon Statutory Requirements:

The 211 Statute requires that the State OEM work with a statewide nonprofit which will:

  • Provide a Statewide database (meaning the capacity to access info from around the state- interoperability – not necessarily one database)
  • Provide a system to recommend 211 providers
  • Be financially stable
  • Confer with OEM—on funding allocation

III. Goals for OR211:

  • Promote/facilitate the development of statewide 211 coverage
  • Assist regions to develop plans and obtain funding
  • Serve as the glue to hold the 211 system together
  • Provide seed funding to help get 211 operating statewide ongoing coordinating role
  • Provide recommendations to the state on which organizations qualify as 211 providers
  • Create, develop, and maintain structure for statewide database [interoperability]
  • Statewide marketing of 211
  • Funding—shared, coordinated effort to fund regional and statewide activities
  • Establish criteria for regional and statewide efforts

Short Term Priorities for OR211

  • Get resources/support
  • Systems development
  • Strengthening regional efforts
  • Build 211 identity—stakeholders, policy makers
  • Creating integrated database
  • Figure out how to get statewide coverage
  • Define regions

Longer term goals:

  • Coordination and facilitation of fluid collaboration
  • Maintain and enhance database
  • Strengthen/build 211 identity –public awareness

IV. Staffing:

Participants agreed that professional level staffing will be needed to move forward towards short term goals. Participants envision an Executive Director type role – although the position may initially be handled through a contract. Key roles for the professional staff position would include:

  • Fund development
  • Support regional development
  • Build partner relationships
  • Provide the leadership skills usually found in an ED
  • Board development
  • Help build advisory task forces
  • Political/legislature savvy

Participants agreed that salary range would need to be from $55,000 to $70,000 (plus benefits) to attract a person with the needed skills.

Participants also envisioned providing some clerical support to assist the professional position.

Rough estimate: OR211 will need to obtain $100,000 - $125,000 per year for 2 to 3 years

Funding proposals should focus on start up and capacity building strategies. The proposal should demonstrate that investment in the proposed capacity building activities will result in the development of sustainable regional centers.

Participants envision placing the staff in an existing nonprofit organization which would provide accounting, space, phones, receptions, and possibly clerical support.

Participants determined that staff should be located in Salem or Portland and expressed an initial preference for a Salem location. Howard Klink and Priscilla Gould were asked to explore the possibility of United Way of the Columbia Willamette serving as fiscal sponsor and employer for the OR211 staff, while United Way in Salem would be ask to provide office space and support in Salem.

Participants identified OCF as their first back-up strategy in the event that the United Way plan described above proves unworkable. Howard and Priscilla will report to the board at its December meeting.

V. Strategies to Build State Support and Buy-in:

Participants identified issues and strategies that need to be addressed to build state support:

  • May need to obtain public money already in counties and state agencies
  • Need to show we are really serving rural/eastern OR
  • DHS and HCS – might be asked to put money in
  • Availability of federal match would really help
  • Might appeal for money now spent marketing government programs
  • Get Governor’s active support
  • Involve: County Commissioners, Legislators [statewide], Association of Counties

VI. Board Structure:

Participants reviewed the current Board structure requirements in the OR211 bylaws:

  • 8 members which should include but not be limited to representatives of CADO, OCADSV, and each 211 center
  • By-laws allow from 5-15 board members

Participants brainstormed ideas for the board OR211 will need in the next few years:

  • Geographic representation- reflect the entire state
  • Consider whether to include consumers and /or advocates
  • Be less specific on represented groups – use “potential partners” system
  • Individuals with relationships with business, faith communities, civic organizations and leaders
  • Members with political clout
  • Members with access to philanthropic resources

Participants identified 4 possible options for the composition of the Board, including:

Option A

1/3 211 service providers

2/3 statewide types

Option B

Make those with interest—211 providers and partners become Advisory Committee

Board would be leaders for developing OR211

15 members—Business, political, philanthropic, OEM liaison

Option C

1/3 Service providers

1/3 Business/civic/political/ Telco

1/3 consumers and advocates

Option D

Regional representation required

½ business—Telco, private sector call centers, civic, legislators, strategic partners

½ service providers and consumers [with barriers]—be sure to have state perspective

With Advisory Committee—typical task force

Conclusion: Board Composition Goal

Evolve from current mix to engaging advisors for specific projects

To eventually become:

  • ½ business/civic/philanthropic
  • ½ 211 providers and partners, statewide/consumers

VII. Tasks:

  1. Howard and Priscilla will investigate the proposed “home” for OR211 staff and recommend decision to Board in December.
  2. Explore potential funders and prepare grant applications:
    • Stephen will draft a 2 page concept paper,
    • Board members will do some on-line editing of the concept paper,
    • Leadership Team on the funding effort will involve Jeri, UW, Southern Oregon
  3. Jeri will coordinate Board activity before staff is obtained. She will organize December board meeting, including asking board members to consider who should take leadership of the board. The Board will elect a chair for 2007 at the December board meeting.
  4. OEM will provide space for December meeting.
  5. Coordinate efforts on database and regional centers –continue development before staffing
  6. Meet with OEM Director to lay out plans and working relationship
    • Find way to get liaison to OR211 at OEM identified
    • Get other state agencies to buy in with money for OEM
    • Jeri, David, Kathleen, Jonathon and Ellen will provide leadership on this effort
  7. Develop policy on number of regions and process for affiliation/designation, and create analysis on what’s already planned, propose plan for rest of the state. Wendy will draft plan for board review, drawing upon work done earlier.
  8. Database sub-committee tasks
    • Shawn will convene with participation by Len, Kathleen, Jimi, June
    • Figure out how integration will happen
    • Need to understand what’s happening at state level at DAS
    • Ellen could talk with DAS to gain understanding and support within state government
    • Recognize that ownership and money for maintenance will be key issues

VIII. Next Meeting:

9am-noon in Salem December 12th

IX. Loose ends

Participants identified loose ends which they will need to deal with at future meetings:

  • Local government contact strategy
  • Legislative session—tracking/initiating
  • Relationships between 211s and volunteer centers or other strategies for volunteer coordination for community emergencies
  • Need to decide whether OR211 will have a state position on 211s and volunteer connections for community emergency response capacity?
  • Need board member recruitment

X. Timeline for Creation of Oregon 211

Participants reviewed the history of the effort to create Oregon 211:

  • NIRA (National Information and Referral Alliance) – formed around 2000
  • NWAIRS (NW Alliance of Information and Referral Services) — formed around 2000
  • July 2000- Federal Communications Commission requires reserving 211 for I&R services
  • Oregon conversations about 211 begin —2001
  • Ad Hoc group formed to explore 211
  • OR211 Steering Committee formed—2002
  • UW Columbia-Willamette begins supports efforts to establish 211 services—2002-2003
  • Gates Foundation awards grant to help OR and WA—04
  • OR211 incorporated
  • UW of America grant to do start-up work on OR211
  • Business plan for OR211 completed
  • OR State legislation establishing 211
  • DAS adds 211#--2003
  • Statewide Summit – 2003
  • Proposal to Murdock Trust says no to OR211 proposal—January 2005
  • 4 regions identified: metro, Southern OR, Deschutes County, Lane County
  • Consider Idaho/Washington connections as best strategy for Eastern OR211 services
  • Ford Family Foundation helps Southern OR get started on 211—2005
  • OR211 Tech committee recommends software—2004
  • OR211 Board begin to settle and focus—2005-2006
  • 501(c)(3) status obtained 2006
  • 10 current Board members—all slots are representatives of organizations except for Shawn
  • $8000 obtained for 2006

Aug 15, 2006

OR 211 Board of Directors

Wednesday, August 15, 2006

9:00 AM - Noon

Oregon Department of Emergency Management

Attendance:  Jeri Shumate, Jonathan Brock, Stephen Guntli, Len Hockley, Kathleen McHarg, Jimi Smith, Roy Spurgeon, Wendy VanElverdinghe, June Sedarbaum

Welcome and Introductions - we did introductions including names, organization, and involvement with 2-1-1 and / or I & R.

Meeting Minutes Approval

Wendy apologized for not getting them out prior to the meeting, and asked to bump this to the next meeting.

Regional Updates

211info - Outreach to three additional counties in southwestern Washington State - Cowlitz, Skamania and Whatcom.  The phone number that Verizon directed their calls to was problematic.  Jeri reported the problem, and it was fixed in two hours.  X-O also has a problem.  Jeri has been on vacation so was unable to follow-up.  Both Jeri and Jimi said they would follow-up.  Because 211info receives no funding from Multnomah County, and 211info needed to adjust hours of service, it was decided to only cut back hours for Multnomah County lines.  With the reduced hours, rumors started flying.  It is hoped that the County will take notice and become a better player / partner in the future.

Lane 211 - The six month update of all phone numbers in the data base (The Lane) has been completed.  The initiation for updating the full database is now underway.  The group interested in 2-1-1 continues to meet.  Currently the funds raised are going to keeping the database current and available on line.  The Business Plan has been completed.  When it was presented to the local utility they were so impressed that they doubled their financial commitment.

Southern Oregon 211 - Work continues on the database and resource notebook.  Without dedicated staff it is a slow process.  We are pulling together the next meeting to discuss "Where we are" and next steps.  Service Point is up and running.  Several suggestions were made to secure volunteers to do data entry, including the local United Way as well as clients from Voc Rehab.

National Update

Jeri has been invited to serve on the National 2-1-1 "think tank".  There is a continued effort to promote 2-1-1 to congress and seek federal funding.

Board

June has asked to serve on the Board of OR 211.  She has regularly attended our meetings and has knowledge and understanding of 2-1-1 and could provide a link to United Way, which was lost when Lou Enge resigned her position at United Way of Lane County.  Concerns about brining on new board members as we are considering restructuring the Board and also revising the member's duties were raised.

Len Hockley moved and Jonathan Brock seconded to suspend the formal application process to bring June Sedarbaum onto the 2-1-1 Board.  Motion passed with 6 yeas and 1 abstention.

Strategic Discussion - Preparing for the Board Retreat

Jeri lead the discussion, stating the purpose of the retreat is to discuss the future of OR 211 and how to have a statewide network.

At the last meeting we discussed bringing in partners and former interested parties for the retreat, including: Priscilla Gould, President of United Way of Oregon, David Foster with Oregon Housing and Community Services and former co-chair of the 211 steering committee, Lowell Greathouse, formerly with United Way of the Columbia-Willamette, currently a Methodist Pastor and former co-chair of the 211 steering committee, Liesl Wendt former consult for 211, and Ellen Lowe, lobbyist for United Way of the Columbia-Willamette who was instrumental in getting 211 legislation passed last session.

Currently OR 211 has a proposal in to United Way for $3000 to fund work to develop a strategy for the next legislative session.  We will amend that proposal to seek funding for the retreat planning and than the retreat itself.

Steve suggested we look at the Business Plan, specifically pages 25-27 on the Roles and Responsibilities of OR 211, and pages 44-45 on challenges.  The current Business Plan is visionary, but not realistic.  Using the plan as a place to start, and develop steps to achieve the roles and responsibilities while meeting the challenges.

The retreat should include:

  1. An overview of 2-1-1 in Oregon and accomplishments to date
  2. Why - one really good reason for 2-1-1 in Oregon, a "sound bite" or elevator speech
  3. Realistic goals - revisit the roles and responsibilities in the Business Plan (Pages 25-27)  and redefine as 3 year goals with steps to accomplish the goals
  4. Staffing and Resource Development - see Pages 44-45 in the Business Plan; we are doing fairly well on the second challenge and need to address the first one - "Obtain sustained, consistent public and private support to build the network of call centers . . ."
  5. Create a shared vision on who/what OR 211 should be
  6. Develop a timeline for accomplishing this work

Additional suggestions / discussion

  • Collaboration Theory - discuss why each partner is at the table, and what each contribute so we can move forward while raising funds to hire staff.
  • Options for OR 211's future:
  •  Abandon the project
  •  Continue to limp along
  •  Reorganize and re-energize the organization and work OR 211 is doing
  • Identify our allies at the federal state and local levels, especially among elected officials.
  • Define our structural needs.
  • Define concrete goals with a timeline and measurable outcomes. The current business plan does not do this, at least not realistically.
  • Political realities need to be kept in mind. We need funding for the State agency to provide oversight and funding for structural / foundation work for the organization.
  • Abandonment came up again:
  • Is it an option we can live with?
  • If not, can OR 211 do the job?
  • If not, is 211info appropriate?
  • Are there other options?

Possible retreat facilitator:  Start with Kay Sohl.  Have a two hour discussion with Kay to define the work and the details for the retreat.  If Kay is not available to facilitate the retreat, ask her who she thinks can lead us through this difficult discussion.  Other suggestions include Cindy Becker and Ken Allen.

Jonathan offered to contribute his own funds to make the retreat a success.  He offered $100.  Others chimed in to his challenge.  Jeri will send a letter to the Board to solicit personal contributions, with information on where the checks should be made out to for tax purposes.

Possible retreat dates to float with Kay:  November 6, 7, 8, 16 or 1st. 

Financial Report

Len had a report, but since it was not on the agenda, and there has been no change since last month, it was tabled until next meeting.

Next Meeting:  Tentatively set for Sept. 26, from 9-noon.  Jeri will confirm.

Meeting adjourned.

Jun 28, 2006

OR 211 Board of Directors

Wednesday, June 28, 2006

9:00 AM - Noon

Oregon Department of Emergency Management

Attendance:  Jeri Shumate, Jonathan Brock, Stephen Guntli, Len Hockley, Kathleen McHarg, Jimi Smith, Wendy VanElverdinghe, June Harris

Welcome and Introductions

Meeting Minutes Approved

In the May minutes, on page 3, change HTML to XML.

Kathleen McHarg moved and June Harris seconded approval of the May minutes as amended. Motion approved unanimously.

Financial Report

Jeri Shumate will check out the end of the State fiscal year situation.  If it is a problem she will use money to pay telephone companies for Southern Oregon set-up.

Kathleen McHarg moved and Len Hockley seconded acceptance of financial report. Motion approved unanimously.

Regional Updates

Lane 211

We successfully raised the budget of $5000.  The funds arrived yesterday.  A full update is coming this fall. Currently we are checking all numbers in the database, and will complete the review this week.  Next year's budget is $40,000 - just for The Lane (database).  We are asking members to double their contributions from this year.  The Lane will be moved to the United Way of Lane County website for more visibility and more traffic.

Reports

AIRS Conference

 

Jeri said this is her seventh AIRS conference, and she continues to go because she gains new information every time.  2-1-1 is maturing, from "How to do it" to "How to improve it", "How to cross states", "How to back-up other states in crisis" (hurricanes, etc), and how to fund this work.  Jeri attended the State Directors meeting for the first time.   They hold monthly conference calls with about 25 states participating.

Jimi stated that the emergency uses (hurricanes) workshop was very helpful.  Kathleen attended the Aging and Disability Services track.  The article by women involved in Katrina, found in the AIRS Journal is very good. 

Mention was made of the Monroe report on Katrina.

Database update:  Iris / Tapestry / Sun Coast

Referred                    Iris                      Service Point                     North Point

Alliance              Vision Link           Bowman Systems         Resource House

XML - specifics - not a final schema

Vendors create an XML export tool (four done)

Vendors create an XML import tool

It has been declared final, but continues to be revised.

All have web presences.

To access the database go to http://www.211info.org/.

OR 211 website Update:  see handout.

What is the purpose of the website?

Should it include a user name and password?

Should it have a calendar?

We walked through the 12 proposed pages of the website and gave feedback.

Verizon and cell phones - Verizon, in theory has been done.  Jeri was told in May that it could be done by June 30; but calls are not coming in yet.  Jeri participated in a workshop at the AIRS conference on how to get cell phones turned on to 211.  She hopes to work on this for 211info in the near future.

Pay phones will be more difficult to have switched, and are not going to be included in the near future.

Use of National Logo - co-branding is ok.  The application is available on-line.  Jeri has it.  Logo Guidelines including color palette and are sent once approved.  No alterations are allowed, including putting the outline of the state around the national logo.

Review Call Center Application:

Wendy VanElverdinghe moved and Kathleen McHarg seconded approval of the Application to be a 211 Call Center in Oregon.  The motion was approved unanimously.

Strategy Discussion

Jeri created handouts to discuss Legislative Mandates and a worksheet for outlining which agency (OR 211 and / or 211info) is able to accomplish the work outlined in the legislation)

Funding is the big question for OR 211, or for any agency taking on the work.  We need to review the business plan, and update for the next 2 - 3 years.

Jeri drafted a history of 2-1-1 in Oregon.  All board members need to read the history and the business plan.

Next steps:

  1. Use the next meeting to organize a full day retreat - need all board members to attend
  2. Set a new meeting date for July since many will not be available on the current date
  3. Ask Kay Sohl to facilitate the retreat
  4. Jeri will ask DHS if it is an appropriate use of their funds
  5. All board members are asked to read the history, business plan, and meeting minutes to hold informed discussion for retreat planning
  6. Define outcomes from retreat.

Others to invite to the retreat:  Priscilla, David Foster, Ellen Lowe, Lowell Greathouse and Liesl Wendt.

Meeting adjourned.

May 24, 2006

 

OR 211 Board of Directors

Wednesday, May 24, 2006

10:00 AM - Noon

Oregon Department of Emergency Management

Attendance:  Jeri Shumate, Jonathan Brock, Stephen Guntli, Kathleen McHarg, Jimi Smith, Roy Spurgeon, Wendy VanElverdinghe, June Harris

Welcome and Introductions

Meeting Minutes Approved

In the March minutes, Wendy's named is misspelled (Windy) on page two, in the bullet

"we form a legislative sub-committee (Roy, Lou, Stephen, Wendy, ask Jeri)."

Wendy VanElverdinghe moved and Jonathan Brock seconded approval of the March minutes as amended.  Motion approved unanimously.

Wendy VanElverdinghe moved and Jimi Smith seconded approval of the January minutes.  Motion approved unanimously.

Marcia Suttenberg submitted her resignation from the board for medical reasons.  The Board accepted her resignation.

Financial Report

Len Hockley was unable to attend the Board meeting.  We do not have a financial report.  Jeri gave a brief summary.  OR 211 received $5500 from DHS in late December, 2005.  She will follow-up with DHS for the date by which the funds must be spent, and to report on how the funds expended to date have been spent.  Jeri stated there has been no change in the financial statement since the March report.

Jonathan Brock moved and Wendy VanElverdinghe seconded that DHS be asked if $500 can be used for administration of the grant by 211info.  Motion approved unanimously.

Regional Updates

Lane 211

Large community support and development of 2-1-1 in Lane County.  Currently they have no funding.  They are waiting for federal funding for 2-1-1.  Follow-up is happening with current partners to fund "The Lane" database - http://www.thelane.info/ and to ask partners to consider adding funding to their next fiscal year budget.  Lane 211 is a priority for Priscilla Gould, Executive Director of United Way of Lane County, and she will be fundraising from private foundations.  June recently learned that the Lane County Commission for Children and Families has prioritized Information and Referral and she will be following up with them to find out more about their intents.

211info

Jeri is pleased to announce that 211info passed their AIRS accreditation.

SW Washington will be adding three counties to the 211info network - Skamania, Cowlitz and Wahkiakum.  It is already a large call center, serving more than 1.9 million people.  It is the biggest in the tri-state region.  With the addition of the three Washington Counties it will serve over 2 million people.

Washington State Legislature awarded $2.5 million in operating expenses from the State General Fund for the 2-1-1 network serving Washington.  Multnomah County again declined to give funds to 211info, yet they have the biggest population base and generate the most calls.

Reports

Website update:  The site still says "under construction".  We contracted in November to have this work done, and paid the consultant in December.  Jeri will follow-up with Shawn Michael who worked with the contractor to find out why it still says under construction, and when it will be completed.

Filing of State and Federal Documents: All state documents have been filed.  The federal documents were submitted to the IRS November 28, 2005.  Jeri received a letter from the IRS on December 23, 2005 stating the documents had been received.  She called in mid-April to find out the status of our submission.  It had not yet been assigned to a case manager.

Washington State 211 Developments:  UCN Telecom completing state paperwork / RFP.  The work was awarded to UCN.  Jeri has visited several other states.  Jeri asked if she should encourage WIN 211/UCN to keep the door open for Oregon participation.  We do not make a commitment at this point.

Verizon and other telecommunication items211info has signed an agreement with Verizon, and the service should be turned on at this point.  The final agreement was an improvement from the original proposal.

AIRS Conference will take place in two weeks.  Jeri is attending and will participate in workshops on "How to turn cell phone on in 60 days" and also one on pay phone service.

Office of Emergency Management Meeting:  Jonathan Brock, Ken Keim and Ken Murphy with the Office of Emergency Management met with Jeri Shumate to discuss the timeline for implementation of the legislation from last session (HB 3443).  The 9-1-1 managers are meeting on May 31.  Jeri will do a presentation on 2-1-1 and how the two systems compliment each other.

Review of Oregon Legislation

ORS 401.260 to .325 (implemented HB 3443).

At the last board meeting we agreed to pursue funding from the State in the 2007 session.

Jeri has asked for permission from the United Way of America for OR 211 to use the national logo with the change of OR instead of UW/AIRS.

Section 5 - database, does the database need to be on-line, or can it be in print?  Do the databases need to be able to share information with other call centers in the state?  A variety of database software is currently being used - Service Point, Iris, Tapestry.  Currently these database do not share information.  AIRS is working on HTML for databases to speak t each other.  Export and import of information - works one way only at this time.

Section 5 (3) - need to define funding / financial capacity.  Then need to decide if OR 211 fit this definition.

Section 6 - explains the need for call center applications.

Section 7 - hotline - need a definition; does "Flu Shot Shortage Hot Line" fit the definition?

Section 8 is the funding section - no funds from State of Oregon or Office of Emergency Management.

Section 9 sets up a separate dedicated fund for 211 so that it is not part of the Oregon General Fund.

Federal S211 legislation requests $150 million for two years.

OR 211 / 211info

It would take a lot of work for OR 211 to meet the requirements of HB 3443.  Should we consider having 211info be the non-profit to receive statewide funding?  Who enforces the standards since there are no funds to do this in the legislation?  Will 211info want to accept this responsibility?

Pro - Why 211info is a good choice

  • 211info has infrastructure in place
  • Because of SafeNet, 211info is already thinking statewide
  • 211info has a vested interest in ensuring the statewide system is working (and to get increased funding)
  • 211info Board currently represents four counties, and has representation from each county

Con - obstacles for 211info to fulfill requirements of HB 3443

  • Will the non metro area accept 211info as the lead agency
  • Will the metro area be ok with local funds going outside the region?
  • Does 211info want to assume the enforcements tasks along with all the other responsibilities?

Other Questions and Ideas

  • Staff for region or statewide?
  • Should 211info become OR 211
  • DO / protect interest of "the state"
  • If a temporary role, could it be reversed, and would anyone / everyone want it to?
  • Clark County, Washington is part of 211info. How would WIN 211 be involved with the Oregon's 211 system?

For OR 211 to assume responsibilities outlined in the legislation:

Pro:     They have the desire and passion

Con:  Do not have the capacity - no staff

            Currently not a fundraising board

Questions and Ideas

  • To fund OR 211 it needs to have infrastructure. Funding is needed from either the State of Federal government to move forward.
  • Could OEM receive the funds to hire staff?
  • Should the Board be recreated with Government funds to perhaps hire a state staff person to help build the infrastructure

Call Center Application

Need an entity to review the applications.  Should that be the OR 211 Board, a committee, and if a committee only Board members or interested partners as well?

Jimi shared additional changes with Jeri.  Those changes will be incorporated in the document and the revised document will be sent to Board members.  All Board members present agreed to review the document and come to the next meeting prepared to approve the Call Center Application.

Next Meeting

Because of the amount of work to be completed, the Board agreed to meet monthly for the next two months and then evaluate if we should continue to meet monthly.

The meetings are scheduled for:

Wednesday, June 28 from 9:00 AM to Noon at Oregon Department of Emergency Management, 3225 State Street in Salem.

Wednesday, July 26 from 9:00 AM to Noon at Oregon Department of Emergency Management, 3225 State Street in Salem.

Mar 06, 2006

 

Or 211

Board Minutes

March 06

Present: Wendy VanElverdinghe (Community Action Directors of Oregon), Jim Cooper (White Bird Data Base Coordinator), Len Hockley, Lou Enge, Jimi Smith (Community Action, Hillsboro), Jonathan Brock (state police), Stephen Guntli (Or Child Care R&R), Roy Spurgeon (Family Connections of Douglass County), Vena Williams (Lane Family Connections, Guest).

No past minutes available

Elections: Roy elected Vice Chair, Len made the motion, Jimi seconded. Wendy motioned to elect Stephen Guntli to the board, Roy seconded, unanimous.

Legal Status: Still waiting, Shawn Michael (TACS) submitted two months ago.

Call Center Updates:

Lane 211 - Getting data base connected to XML standard. Stream lining data to Tapestry. Pushing Tapestry to see if they are really XML compatible.

211 Info - Hiring another staff for resource department. Call volume increasing with no advertising. Staff can't quite keep up with call volume. Closing in on Verizon contract. Agreed on a price, working on language and minor issues.

Douglas County-Software up by April, have grants submitted to pay for personnel. Clustering all I&R (including Warmline, 211, R&R Parent referrals, and Medicaid transportation) under the same staff person at Douglas Co. Family Connections. Using Service Point. Partnering with Jackson County on joint grant proposals.

Format for Call Center Applications - Jimi suggested numerous edits and noted suggested edits to share with Jeri. We'll ask Jeri to resend draft out to Board prior to next meeting. We'll look at it again during the next meeting. Jimi suggested making generic dates for application deadlines (3 mos, 6 mos, etc.). On page three she suggested reducing redundant language ("obtained from...submitted to...). On page four why define "human services" rather that I&R and 211 service? The OR 211 standards should be listed under the OR211 wide standards. Everyone liked the "What must be in place..." section. It was noted that this was pirated from Washington State. Are we going to make the questions about I&R data optional? On page 11 should we add veterans, disabled, employment, DHS...? There is a place to add others. Let's add a page which applicants could copy to explain their relationships. Says to mail to CADO - update that address.

Proposal to Request Funding from OR Legislature - Washington State got $1 million from their legislature for capital expenses last year, and has approved $2.5 million for operating expenses this year. The Oregon budget is looking better. We might keep the corporate kicker. There is one time lottery money. This might be a good time to ask for $ if we can make a good argument. Argue that, in a long run, it saves money to put money into 211. We have natural allies such as Douglas County, where 911 lines were jammed up during floods.

It was proposed that we:

  • move forward on asking the legislature for funding
  • ask Ellen Lowe to act as our point person in Salem
  • we form a legislative sub-committee (Roy, Lou, Stephen, Windy, ask Jeri)

Suggested that we invite Kathleen McHarg to join the legislative committee.

The 911 Association also has a lobbyist. We should ask that person if they will embrace our 211 talking points. People running for Governor should receive our 211 talking points this summer. Ellen Lowe will know the time line which we need to follow.

We need to further define our relationship to the Office of Emergency Management. Let's put that on the agenda for the next meeting and review language which is in the existing bill (bill that defined the 211 structure in OR.). This review will help us kick off a discussion. We should discuss clarifying relationships between 911, 211 and office of Emergency Management. Do we need a memo of agreement with OEM?

On May 24th our Legislative subcommittee should meet at 9a.m.

Schedule presentation from UCN Telecommunication to OR211. Jimi to ask Jeri to schedule them for Board meeting.

 

Next Board Meeting: May 24th, 10a.m.-12noon, preceded by a 9a.m. Legislative Committee meeting.

Both meetings will be at OR Dept of State Policed in Salem,

3225 State Street, Corner of State and Hawthorn (exit 253 off Interstate 5 from either direction) If you get lost their phone number is 378-2911.

Jan 25, 2006

Present:

Jeri Shumate, 211info (Portland Metro Area)

Len Hockley, White Bird Clinic (Lane County)

Lou Enge, Lane County

June Harris, United Way (Lane County)

Roy Spurgeon, UCAN (Douglas County)

Marcia Suttenberg, Portland Women's Crisis Line

Jimi Smith, CAO (Washington County)

Kathleen McHarg, Multnomah County Aging

Wendy VanElverdinghe, Community Action Directors of Oregon

Discussion Items:

  1. Introductions
  2. Approval of Minutes - Passed
    1. Discussion - Needed to review November minutes only
    2. Move - Wendy
    3. Second - Len
    4. In Favor - All
    5. Opposed - None
    6. Abstained - None
  3. Approval of Financial Report
    1. Discussion -
  • i. Report of current grant requests outstanding was provided by Jeri
  • ii. DHS grant expenditure discussion will occur later in the meeting
    1. Move - Lou
    2. Second - Roy
    3. In Favor - All
    4. Opposed - None
    5. Abstained - None
  1. Election of New Board Members
    1. Discussion -
  • i. Candidates include Roy Spurgeon, Jimi Smith and Kathleen McHarg
  • ii. Candidates described their reasons for being interested in being on the board.
  • iii. Wendy expressed appreciation for the candidates willingness to serve on the board
  • iv. Jeri distributed an updated Board Roster
    1. Move - Wendy
    2. Second - Len
    3. In Favor - All
    4. Opposed - None
    5. Abstained - None
  1. Election of Board Officers
    1. Chair
  • i. Jeri is nominated
    1. Vice Chair
    2. Treasurer
  • i. Len is nominated
    1. Secretary
  • i. Wendy is nominated
    1. Move to accept the slate - Marcia
    2. Second - Lou
    3. In Favor - All
    4. Opposed - None
    5. Abstained - None
  1. Regional Updates
    1. 211info
  • i. Three county directories are now available currently, Clackamas is in process
  • ii. Finished remodel of offices in Portland. Have increased number of workstations, and reconfigured to allow for a meeting space and new entrance. Landlord provided some of the remodel at no cost, Washington State DSHS was going to help pay for capital costs but may or may not.
  • iii. Position open - call center manager; applications accepted through Feb. 28 with hiring estimated to happen in May 2006.
  • iv. Child care resource and referral - contract with Mt. Hood Community College currently; 211info will house two of their staff under contract with MHCC.
  • v. 211 will be live in Clark County on Feb. 22; along with other areas of the state managed by WIN211. Funded by existing money primarily as funders have foreseen 211 and been supportive.
    1. Southwest Oregon 211
  • i. Ford Foundation has provided some funding
  • ii. Shawn has trained Carol Evans on populating the Service Point Resource Point database
  • iii. Roy will be working with the under sheriff to try and bring them into partnership
  • iv. Discussions are continuing with Arnie Green of Community Works (Jackson County), Josephine, Klamath, Curry and Coos counties as well
    1. Central Oregon
  • i. Jeri has had some discussion
  • ii. Have lost some ground due to turn over in leadership
  • iii. 2007 would be too aggressive of a timeline for 211 according to local leaders
  • iv. Will try to find someone to participate on OR211 Board
  • v. They are only looking at Deschutes County
    1. Lane County
  • i. Existing I & R funding has decreased recently; going back to those funders
  • ii. Currently have a leadership team advisory group made up of community partners - I & R providers and government
  • iii. The committee is staffed currently by United Way
  • iv. White Bird is county comprehensive I & R; funded primarily by CAP, county and United Way; manages the database being used - "The Lane" (http://www.thelane.info/)
  • v. Discussions have been had with potential other partners including Mental Health
    1. Marion County
  • i. Invited to board meeting, but have not had more conversation at this point.
    1. 211 Statewide
  • i. Currently the number "211" for the entire state is pointing to 211info for residential land lines at this point as a result of Katrina response requirements. Note: business and cell telecommunications companies are not on board yet
  • ii. When new communities come on board, 211info will switch the connections
  • iii. Call volume is low at this point; and regional (i.e. Idaho cross-border) telecommunications issues.
  • iv. Marcia asked if there was a long range goal of the state getting connected to the phone system.
  • v. Some history of the network of partners and the intention of how they will be connected technologically was discussed with new board members
  • vi. 211info does not have the intention to cover the entire state on an ongoing basis, but took the opportunity to cover what was needed at the time
  • vii. Wendy mentioned that the governor's office initiated the action, and should then be supportive of future 211 funding
  1. Jeri reviewed the remaining agenda items

LUNCH BREAK

  • Website update -
    • Re-structure is almost completed
    • Content is being brought together
    • Need to determine where the site will be hosted and if $3.50/month hosting fee can be covered
  • Board Recruitment
    • Possible new recruits - someone from Deschutes county as yet unnamed, Julie Harrelson with Ruby Communications
    • Discussion around who it is appropriate to have on a board - call center representatives, consultants, etc.  National scrutiny has increased.  We may be able to pursue a way for Julie to become involved with the board without compromising the integrity of the board.
    • Bylaws allow up to 20 members.
    • Jeri suggested Melinda Gross from Marion County
    • Jeri will be calling David Foster with HCS to ask if there are any suggestions for new board members that he may have
    • Wendy will follow up with Eastern Oregon CADO Board Members and Red Cross (Marion County chapter) to see if there are potential members there.  Lane County has not had success in getting Red Cross involved to this point.  Lou will reconnect with contact.
    • Len suggested contacting County Sheriff offices
  • Board Application Packet
    • Reviewed, and some revisions have been suggested by Jimi.  Jeri asked Jimi to email her comments so that she could make the suggested revisions.
  • Board Members Handbook
    • Reviewed Handbook contents; Board members will review
    • May need to create a committee to review the standard language used in the vision statement and mission statement - Jimi will forward some language to Jeri around the statements
    • Clarification - roster changes should be submitted to Jeri
    • Clarification - currently there is no project manager replacing George Grosch
    • Reviewed proposed 2006 Budget as unfunded
  • Call Center Application
    • Board should review and discuss at the next board meeting
    • Application is based upon other state implementations
    • Application Review Committee to be formed to review applications
    • Process provides for OR211 to make recommendations about which organizations will be 211 call centers, but OEM will make the final decision
    • Existing participants (i.e. 211info, White Bird Clinic, UCAN, Clackamas County) will need to complete applications
  • State and Federal documents filed
    • Federal has acknowledged receipt and should respond within 120 days
    • State documentation has been completed and filed with a $50 fee paid by 211info, but should be covered by budget
  • Grant research and applications
    • Jeri has begun research of possible funding sources and identified possible grant opportunities
  • Presentation to state 911 providers
    • State 911 system is supportive of the 211 effort.
    • Possible follow up may be to be included in funding requests for homeland security  funding
    • Len went through a "bio-emergency" test in Lane County that seemed supportive of the concept of 211
    • Lou mentioned that Mark McCay (sp??) works at the county sheriff's department and is a possible contact
    • Roy is beginning to have conversations with Emergency Management and the Sheriff's office in Douglas County
  • Verizon and other telecommunications items
    • Portland Business Journal published an article that outlined success with other telecommunications companies other than Verizon.
    • Jeri will need to follow up with Verizon to confirm the proposed fee being equal to that paid to Qwest
    • Reviewed history of negotiation for new board members
  • Review of national logo use
    • Motion to adopt national logo usage similar to co-branding used by Washington
      • Move - Lou
      • Second - Roy
      • In Favor - All
      • Opposed - None
      • Abstained - None
    • Jeri will send members logo
    • Jeri will arrange for license to use logo on web site and in co-branding with partners
  • Determine distribution of DHS Funding
    • Reviewed email discussion between DHS representative and Jeri and what was proposed
    • Request from Southern Oregon is for $1,350 for software licensing and $1160 for telecom switching costs
    • Will use part of the administration for incidental costs
    • Fund Development and Program Development are items that should be a higher priority
    • Other grants are targeted towards paying for community and program development in counties not yet implemented/included in existing 211 implementations
    • Kathleen made a motion for funding first part of Southern Oregon and remainder for OR211 program development to be further defined at a future meeting - $2,510 for software licensing and telecom switch fees
      • Move - Kathleen
      • Second - Wendy
      • In Favor - All
      • Opposed - None
  • Review state legislation
    • Jeri encouraged a detailed look at the materials and we will discuss more in future meetings
  • Next meeting - March 22 in Eugene
  • New Business
    • Form Committee to work on XML Standards - Kathleen, Shawn, Len, Jimi

Adjourned at 2:05pm

Subcommittees